FIVE THOUSAND kilometers from Cairo, bathed in the warm
tropical showers of a seasonal monsoon, is a rusting sign
dedicated to an unlikely hero: Ahmed Orabi. Exiled to Sri
Lanka in 1882, the Egyptian nationalist is an icon of
political unity for Muslims living in this predominantly
Buddhist island nation.
“Orabi Pasha taught us that the best way to preserve our
Muslim identity was to be educated,” says commerce student
Ashkar Ahamed. “He showed us a new way of thinking.”
Sri Lanka, formerly known as Ceylon, the tropical island of
lush jungles and white sand beaches, is steeped in legend.
Seafaring Arab traders first set foot on Sri Lanka’s shores
in the 8th century, settling in port towns to trade spices,
gems and silk. The fragrant and lucrative scent of spices
also attracted the Portuguese, who arrived in 1505 and
quickly established a monopoly on the cinnamon trade. Local
rulers enlisted the help of the Dutch to drive out the
increasingly abusive Portuguese, only to find the Dutch had
colonial ambitions of their own. Some 140 years later, the
British sent the Dutch packing and declared Sri Lanka a
crown colony in 1802.
By this time, Muslims or Ceylon Moors, as they were called
accounted for about five percent of the population. Some
were descendents of Arab traders; others more recent
arrivals from Malaysia and India. All agreed that living
under British rule was far preferable to the Catholic fervor
of the Portuguese, the avaricious commercialism of the
Dutch, or the despotic Sinhalese kings who held sway over
the island’s mountainous interior.
“The British treated the Moors more fairly than any previous
rulers,” says Ahamed. “They removed the heavy burden of
taxation imposed by the Dutch and gave Muslims more rights.”
|
Cam
McGrath/Egypt Today
|
|
|
The British granted Muslims as well as the island’s other
ethnic groups the right to formulate legislation dealing
with their own personal rights, abolished punishment by
torture and repealed a Dutch property law that segregated
ethnic minorities.
The softer rule of the 19th century made room for an
emerging Muslim consciousness. The Ceylon Moors began
formulating symbols of their identity and reviving the
Arabic language, religious education and a watered-down form
of social traditions. They knew what they wanted to create,
but had no model to follow.
Then, on a breezy January morning in 1883, a man with some
answers strolled down the gangplank of a steamship and into
the Sri Lankan Muslim consciousness.
Exiled Egyptian nationalist Ahmed Orabi became a local
superstar.
A MAN FOR THE PEOPLE
Born in 1841 in Horiyeh, near Zagazig, Ahmed Orabi was the
peasant son of a village sheikh. Conscripted into the army
at age 13, his meteoric rise through the ranks saw him
promoted to full colonel before his 20th birthday.
Orabi saw Egypt sell itself into slavery in his youth. Said
Pasha, the khedive of Egypt, commissioned the Suez Canal
project to French and Ottoman stockholders in 1854. Egypt
covered most of the capital and corvée labor to build the
canal, but was eventually forced to sell its shares in the
project to the British to cover the massive debts it
incurred.
Said Pasha and his successor, Ismail Pasha, squandered
Egypt’s cotton wealth on palaces, canal debts and misguided
mega-projects.
“Egypt was drawn into a debt trap and it became impossible
to repay this debt because Egypt had to make more loans just
to pay the interest,” explains Raouf Abbas, president of the
Egyptian Society for Historical Studies (ESHS). “European
powers intervened under the claim of protecting the
investments of their financial institutions and established
a mechanism for bringing Egypt under foreign occupation.”
As customs, houses, railways and tax collection fell under
foreign control, landowners, intellectuals and disgruntled
army officers led an emerging nationalist movement.
|
Cam
McGrath/Egypt Today
|
Zahira College,
the crowning achievement of Lebbe’s Muslim
Education Society |
|
“The debt crisis made it impossible for the government to
honor its promise to reduce the land tax imposed on
landlords to cover the building of the Canal or to give them
their title deeds,” says Abbas. “Meanwhile, Egyptian army
officers were angry because they were not paid for almost a
year and were badly treated by high-ranking officers of
Turkish and Circassian origin.”
In 1881, Orabi led 4,000 nationalist officers on a march on
Abdeen Palace to demand that ruler Tawfik Pasha dissolve his
autocratic government and replace it with a constitutional
model. The khedive recognized his weak position and agreed
to appoint a new prime minister.
“Of course, this development annoyed the foreign powers
because it looked like the nationalist movement would
introduce changes that worked against their interests,”
Abbas says. “It was high time for them to interfere.”
European powers dispatched their fleets to menace
Alexandria. Tawfik Pasha, who was summering in the
Mediterranean city at the time, hurriedly surrendered, but
Orabi (now the wildly popular minister of war) and the army
under his command refused to yield to colonialist demands.
They vowed to fight any foreign aggression against Egypt.
British warships shelled Alexandria in 1882 and set sail to
secure the Canal, and British troops seized Port Said,
Ismailia and Suez before proceeding toward Cairo. Orabi led
the Egyptian army to block their advance at Tel El-Kebir.
|
Cam
McGrath/Egypt Today
|
Maradana Mosque
in Colombo, Sri Lanka |
|
“Orabi Pasha was without support and, within 40 minutes of
desultory fighting, his forces were rounded up by the
British,” a British officer boasted following the battle.
“Orabi himself took refuge in flight.”
Orabi’s defeat at Tel El-Kebir opened Egypt to British
occupation. Orabi and his followers were soon arrested and
charged with inciting rebellion. After a show trial that
lasted just three minutes, the court sentenced to death
Ahmed Orabi, Abdel Aal Helmy, Ali Fehmy, Mahmoud Fehmy,
Toulba Ismet, Yacoub Sami and Ahmed Abdel Ghaffar. The
khedive promptly issued a royal pardon revoking the death
sentences, but condemned the “traitors” to exile and
expropriation of their property.
“The British had no interest in making martyrs of Orabi and
his officers, so they chose to exile him,” says Abbas.
“Ceylon was an obvious choice because no Egyptians lived
there and it was far from Egypt.”
ORABIMANIA SWEEPS COLOMBO
When word reached Sri Lanka that a boatload of Egyptian
revolutionaries was on its way, local officials debated
where to settle them. F.R. Saunders, the government agent of
Western Province, recommended that Orabi and the exiles be
housed in the sleepy Mutuwal district.
|
Cam
McGrath/Egypt Today
|
Ashkar Ahamed,
one of the many Sri Lankans inspired by
Orabi |
|
“That side of the city would be more suitable for the
residence of these foreigners, who doubtless desire
retirement and seclusion, than the more fashionable and
conspicuous parts,” he wrote in a letter to the Colonial
Secretary.
In all probability, Saunders’ intention was to keep the
Egyptian rabble-rousers from interacting with the local
intelligentsia. Governor James R. Longden, however, wasn’t
convinced this would be a problem. After all, Orabi spoke
only Arabic and most Ceylon Moors (who spoke Sinhalese,
Tamil or Malay) would be unable to communicate with him.
The governor confidently sent notice to Saunders that houses
in Colombo’s leafy Lake District had already been selected,
though, “Ultimately the exiles, like any other refugees,
will be allowed to choose their own residence in the
island.”
That wasn’t exactly correct. The British had specifically
ordered that the exiles be prohibited from settling in the
remoter sections of the island. A police constable was
assigned to each exile to keep tabs on their movements.
On December 27, 1882, the exiles and their families boarded
the S.S. Marriott, a chartered passenger ship. The boat
steamed out of Suez harbor with seven ‘chiefs’ and their
wives, children and servants. Inexplicably, Abdel Ghaffar
and his family were not aboard; the families of Helmy and
Ismet, as well as Orabi’s pregnant first wife (of four),
stayed behind.
“The Egyptian government [expropriated] the assets of the
exiles, but they were clever to keep some property in their
wives’ names,” says the noted Sri Lankan historian M.A.
Sherifeddin. “Orabi’s first wife probably planned to use
these holdings to generate income until his return.”
The S.S. Marriott arrived in Colombo harbor on January 10,
1883, and dropped anchor for the night. The following
morning, most of the city’s 32,000 Muslim residents came
down to the harbor to greet the man they dubbed the “King of
the Egyptians.” The crowd cheered as the exiles and their
families disembarked with their police escorts.
A procession followed Orabi to his assigned residence at
Lake House, and many of his admirers camped out in the
garden for several days. The other exiles had their own fan
clubs, which followed them around town as if they were
celebrities.
In the eyes of local Muslims, Orabi was a hero. Not only had
he stood up to the British; he seemed to have somehow earned
their respect as an adversary. Clearly the British felt
threatened by him, or they would not have gone to the
trouble of exiling him to a distant land. Muslims seeking a
political voice felt they could learn a lot from the
Egyptian nationalist.
“We still remember him as a hero,” says Sherifeddin. “He was
not a successful military leader, but his courage to fight
oppression and injustice is respected by all Muslims.”
Orabi’s first public foray after arriving in Colombo was a
visit to the Maradana Mosque to attend Friday prayers. The
large mosque was (and still is) a focal point for the local
Muslim community and an obvious choice for an exile seeking
a few good alliances.
According to the Ceylon Times, Orabi arrived at the mosque
on the morning of January 12, 1883, in a carriage trailed by
a long procession of admirers. He met Muslim community
leaders in the mosque’s courtyard then entered the prayer
hall. The crowd streamed in behind him.
“Of course everyone went to the mosque that day,” says
Sherifeddin. “The people tried to imitate the Egyptian’s
piety and mannerisms.”
Even Orabi’s wardrobe developed a following as Muslim élites
adopted the former politician’s mode of dress. Local tailors
received a deluge of orders for “Orabi suits” and a strange
new type of hat: the Turkish fez. For many, the velvet cap
was a respectable way in which a gentleman could boldly
proclaim his Muslim identity while still being permitted
into jacket-and-tie social functions. (Two decades later,
the nation’s Supreme Court ruled the fez too seditious to be
worn in court.)
British authorities were taken aback by the attention the
Egyptian visitors received. A police report issued several
months after their arrival observed: “The advent of Ahmed
Orabi and other exiles to our shores was the cause of some
excitement among the native population, prior to and after
their arrival and particularly on the day of landing. The
novelty, however, soon wore off and the exiles now move
about attracting scarcely any attention.”
While local interest waned, Orabi’s fame spread to distant
shores. His more notable early visitors included Lord
Gifford, Russia’s Count Boutourline and a rowdy Australian
cricket team on tour. By 1886, Orabi was Colombo’s most
marketable tourist attraction, second only in popularity to
an unusually large and ancient tortoise discovered living in
nearby Mutuwal. Visitors to the city aspired to see both.
Sir William Gregory, a former governor of Sri Lanka,
observed that the exiled nationalist was “subjected at every
hour to intrusions, without introduction, from all the
vulgar riffraff which lands at Colombo and which goes to see
the large tortoise and then to see Orabi.”
British sailors on shore-leave taunted Orabi, throwing
liquor bottles at his house and labeling him a coward for
not dying with the rest of his regiment at Tel El-Kebir.
After years of harassment, Orabi petitioned authorities to
intervene. In a rare English letter, he wrote:
Dear Sir, I am beg to inform you that I have too trouble for
the sailors who always come at my house by dranking [sic]
and wishes come inside without regards our assure, they
broking the doors and beating my servants. I hope you will
attend to this case.
Yours faithfully,
[Sgd.]
Ahamed Arabi
The officer sent to investigate the complaint reported that
while he was at Orabi’s home, three carriages of rowdy
hooligans arrived and “were turned away only with
difficulty.” He recommended that a British constable be
assigned to guard the house, but the request was flatly
denied.
Orabi changed houses several times over the course of a
decade, but the constant harassment eventually drove him out
of Colombo to Kandy, 115 kilometers inland. His house there
on Halloluwa Road is now a museum dedicated to his memory.
LIVING ON THE EDGE
The Egyptian exiles were forbidden to work in Sri Lanka, so
they had to rely entirely on the meager allowance provided
by the Egyptian government, which arranged with the Imperial
Ottoman Bank of Alexandria to pay each of the exiles £362
per year. One British parliamentarian complained this was
“too much for convicted rebel leaders.”
The exiles, however, countered that this was far too little
to support their basic needs. Ali Fehmy’s wife appealed to
high officials: “I have parted with everything I had,
selling all my things under their value, till now I possess
nothing whatever by which to support life. I am reduced with
my children to remain within doors. Not having proper
clothes for myself and my children whom you saw at Cairo.”
Sir William Gregory added a note to Madam Fehmy’s letter,
adding he had seen the interior of Ali Fehmy’s house and
found it “absolutely destitute of furniture.”
But other officials doubted the exiles were truly hard up.
One questioned whether Yacoub Sami, for instance, really
needed a gardener and a horse and carriage. Sri Lanka’s
Inspector General studied the matter carefully, concluding
that the exiles were living modest lives given their former
titles. He wrote:
“They live very quietly and inexpensively in much the style
in which a lieutenant colonel commanding an English regiment
would live there. If this is considered a suitable style for
those who are ex-pashas and ministers and before were
colonels, at the lowest, then their incomes are hardly
sufficient, and those of six of them might be increased from
Rs4,000 to Rs5,000 per annum, Orabi’s left at Rs6,000 as at
present.”
The proposed increase would have brought their allowances in
line with local military officers of similar standing. At
the time, the annual income of a Sri Lankan army colonel was
Rs5,400, while a lieutenant colonel earned Rs4,800 and a
cadet in the civil service Rs3,750.
Meanwhile, a debate raged on in Egypt over whether or not
the exiles’ personal property in Egypt should be thrown into
the equation. Many of them had wives, land and assets that
could, if tapped, generate income to augment their basic
allowances. Determining the value of these personal assets
proved prohibitively difficult, and eventually the Egyptian
government resigned to treat each exile as having no private
means unless proven otherwise.
Consequently, the government in 1886 agreed to increase the
annual allowance of all exiles to £435. It also ordered an
additional £20 per month “for the maintenance of Orabi, who
is the poorest.”
Whether it was deliberate or not, the additional funds
allocated to Orabi seeded envy amongst the exiles. “There is
a strong feeling of dissatisfaction among the others at
Orabi being pensioned more liberally,” one official wrote in
a memo to the governor. He noted that Orabi didn’t share any
of his extra allowance with his compatriots. The remark
irked one commentator, who said Orabi’s integrity and strong
moral character were “unassailable.”
A CLASS OF THEIR OWN
Orabi’s arrival in Sri Lanka came at a critical time for the
island’s Muslim community. Indigenous Sri Lankan Muslims,
the so-called “Ceylon Moors,” were struggling to find their
identity and political voice. Orabi’s presence and
personality helped shape this emerging consciousness.
When the exiles arrived in Sri Lanka in 1883, the total
Muslim population on the island numbered less than 100,000.
The majority of these Muslims were poorly educated merchants
looked down upon by British administrators as less
intelligent and resourceful than the industrious and
educated Indian Tamils.
“Orabi was influential in changing this perception,” says
Sherifeddin. “He encouraged education as a way of improving
our lives and helping others.”
During the late 1880s, a debate raged over the ancestry of
the Ceylon Moors. Politics superseded science as the outcome
of the debate would ultimately determine the composition of
the nation’s Legislative Council. The council was formed in
1833 to offer representation to each of the island’s
distinct ethnic communities. Without recognition as a
distinct race, Muslims were ineligible for a designated seat
on the council. Tamil elitists hoped to keep it that way.
On one side were the wealthy Tamils of Colombo, led by
barrister Sir Ponnambalam Ramanathan. In a thesis presented
to the Royal Asiatic Society in 1888, Ramanathan argued that
the Ceylon Moors were actually Tamils who had converted to
Islam, and that Tamil-speaking Muslims were racially
superior to their co-religionists.
On the other side were the Muslim followers of newspaper
editor and activist I.L.M. Abdul Azeez, who argued that the
Ceylon Moors were the descendents of Arab traders who had
settled on the island centuries ago. He boasted that these
Muslims were racially superior due to their putative descent
from the Hashemite clan of the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH).
After fierce wrangling, the state recognized the Ceylon
Moors as a distinct ethnic group and restructured the
Legislative Council in 1889 to include a Muslim
representative. While Orabi stayed clear of the debate, his
close friendship with M.C. Siddi Lebbe, one of the main
Muslim proponents, thrust him into the political spotlight.
Lebbe was a charismatic community leader from Kandy with a
dream of modernizing Muslim education. At the time, only 30
percent of Muslim men and a mere 1.5 percent of Muslim women
were literate. The low literacy rate deprived the Muslim
community, and particularly its women, from social mobility
and economic development.
“Muslim schools existed, but they were poorly funded and
overcrowded,” notes Sherifeddin. “Families who could afford
it would send their children to English boarding schools to
get the best possible education.”
Orabi had already enrolled his own children in English
Christian schools when he met Lebbe, but the idea of
improving Islamic education struck a chord. He recognized
that well-funded Muslim schools could enrich the religious
identity of youth and protect them from the proselytization
practiced in English Christian schools.
Lebbe founded the Muslim Education Society in 1891.
Liberally financed by philanthropist Wapchi Marikar and
propelled by Orabi’s glowing endorsements, the organization
proceeded to build segregated schools and libraries in
Colombo and Kandy. Students, most of whom spoke only
Sinhalese or Tamil, received instruction in Arabic and
English. For many, it was the first time to read the Qur’an
in its original language.
The society’s crowning achievement was the opening of Zahira
College on the shady grounds next to the Maradana Mosque.
Orabi conducted the 1892 opening ceremony.
“Zahira College was the first higher education facility
specifically for Muslim students,” says Rada Ratnam, the
university’s head librarian today. “It marked a revival of
the Arabic language and religious teachings that had been
neglected.”
By 1896, some 150 students attended Zahira College. Today,
the busy college has several thousand students. Lessons are
held in English, Tamil and Arabic. All students are required
to study the Qur’an.
“Many graduates of Zahira College went on to become the most
influential and respected leaders of our community,” says
Ratnam.
DYING TO GO HOME
Health concerns plagued the exiles. Toulba Ismet was
reportedly ill for months during every monsoon season. His
doctor said in a report that Ismet suffered “so much ill
health that he cannot remain in Ceylon without danger on his
life.”
A medical board appointed in 1890 to assess the health of
the exiles confirmed Ismet’s poor state of health, but said
the damp climate posed no credible threat to the other
exiles. The Consul General of Egypt reviewed the report, but
ruled out any repatriation.
Mahmoud Fehmy, the only exile to go on record as saying the
rain and humidity were not affecting his health, keeled over
and died a few weeks later. Abdel Aal Helmy soon followed
him to the grave, dying of a brain hemorrhage in 1892. His
illegible grave marker is lost among the weathered tombs of
Kuppiayawette Cemetery in Colombo.
The khedive of Egypt finally pardoned Ismet in 1899 on the
grounds of his declining health, but warned the other exiles
not to get their hopes up: “At present no hope can be held
out that the permission now given to Toulba Ismet will be
extended to others in the same category,” he said in a
missive.
It was too much for Yacoub Samy to take. Orabi’s right-hand
man took ill and died. His death caused a furor in the
British parliament and a push for clemency. The Duke of
Cornwall visited Orabi during a tour of Sri Lanka in early
1901, sparking speculation that the nationalist’s release
from exile was imminent.
“I am an old man nearly 60 years of age and all I ask is to
be allowed to die in my dear homeland and that my bones be
buried in peace,” Orabi pleaded.
A pardon came in May. The Egyptian government arranged free
passage for Orabi and his entourage, which according to the
ship’s manifest included four wives, 15 children, one
nephew, four Sinhalese female servants and five others.
If Orabi expected a hero’s welcome home, he was sorely
mistaken. During the intervening 18 years, history had
painted him as a traitor. Moustafa Kamel, the new leader of
Egypt’s nationalist movement, took aim at the tired
revolutionary.
“Kamel accused him of betraying Egypt and making it possible
for the British to invade Egypt,” says the ESHS’ Abbas. “The
new generation who had never known Orabi believed the rumors
that Orabi was bribed by the British to facilitate defeat
[at Tel El-Kebir].”
Half blind and wary of politics, Orabi retired to a small
home in Helwan, where he died a poor man on September 21,
1911. His memory was largely effaced until the 1952
Revolution, which reinvented him as a hero who failed in
what the Free Officers accomplished.
In Sri Lanka, however, Orabi’s significance was never
forgotten.
“Every [Muslim] student
learns of Orabi Pasha and his great struggle in Egypt and
Sri Lanka,” says one religion instructor. “He is remembered
above all for his moral strength.” |